DOJ Asks Appeals Court to Reinstate Charges Against Abrego Garcia
The Story
The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a federal appeals court to reinstate human smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The charges were dismissed in May by a federal judge in Tennessee, who ruled they were vindictive. The DOJ filed a brief on Monday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, rejecting the claim of vindictive prosecution. The department stated that career prosecutors made the decision to seek an indictment based on evidence and the law, believing there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The DOJ also argued that the May court order represented an expansion of judicial power to dismiss criminal charges based on subjective assessments of prosecutorial motives. Abrego Garcia's defense team called the DOJ's statement flat wrong, asserting that the indictment and prosecution were indeed vindictive, supported by evidence presented to the district court. They claimed the case was initiated on White House instructions after Abrego Garcia won a Supreme Court case. Abrego Garcia was previously deported by the Trump administration and had agreed to go to Costa Rica, a country ready to accept him for a year, according to an immigration attorney who accused Customs and Immigration Enforcement of lying to a judge about the reasons for not sending him there. Abrego Garcia was charged last year with two counts of human smuggling stemming from a November 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee.
The Spread
What they agree on
- The U.S. Department of Justice asked a federal appeals court to reinstate criminal charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
- A federal judge in Tennessee dismissed the charges in May, ruling they were vindictive.
- The Justice Department denies the prosecution was vindictive, stating there were legitimate bases to prosecute.
- Abrego Garcia's defense team maintains the prosecution was vindictive and initiated on White House instructions.
- Kilmar Abrego Garcia was previously deported by the Trump administration.
Where they split
- Raw Story emphasizes an immigration attorney's accusation that ICE lied to a judge and deliberately delayed Abrego Garcia's deportation to punish him.
- LiveMint and CBS News focus on the DOJ's legal arguments and Abrego Garcia's defense team's counterarguments regarding the vindictive nature of the prosecution.
- LiveMint and CBS News include details about the specific charges and the November 2022 traffic stop that led to them.