Skip to main content

Bar Council Reverses NALSAR Graduate Enrolment Ban Hours After Issuing It

Culture7 sourcesAug 13, 2026
FlatRigor 607 sources

The Bar Council of India (BCI) on Thursday withdrew its order halting the enrolment of all 2026 law graduates from NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad. The reversal came hours after the BCI initially directed state bar councils not to enrol any NALSAR graduates pending an inquiry into a campaign opposing the proposed participation of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant at the university's convocation. In its revised communication, the BCI stated that its members unanimously concluded that the vast majority of the 2026 graduates were innocent and had not intended to show disrespect. The Council also indicated that a handful of teachers and outsiders may have been instrumental in instigating the students. The BCI will await an inquiry report from the NALSAR Vice-Chancellor before deciding on further action, emphasizing that no student should suffer without fault. The initial order had sought a report from the NALSAR Vice-Chancellor within three days, asking the university to identify those principally involved in the campaign against Justice Kant's invitation. The dispute arose from student objections to Justice Kant's proposed role as chief guest, citing his remarks during proceedings concerning alleged police excesses against NEET protesters. The BCI chairman, Manan Kumar Mishra, had previously stated that students showing disrespect to the highest judicial office could not be expected to become responsible legal professionals. The Advocates Act, 1961, outlines individualised processes for enrolment and disqualification, not collective punishment.

What they agree on

  • The Bar Council of India (BCI) initially ordered state bar councils to halt the enrolment of NALSAR University of Law's 2026 graduates.
  • The BCI withdrew this order hours after issuing it.
  • The BCI cited a campaign by students opposing the invitation of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to the university's convocation as the reason for the initial order.
  • The BCI stated that the vast majority of NALSAR's 2026 graduates were innocent.
  • The BCI is awaiting a report from the NALSAR Vice-Chancellor regarding the campaign.

Where they split

  • Some outlets, including News18 and Hindustan Times, highlight the CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke's reaction and his 'legal cockroaches' slogan.
  • The Hindu and LiveMint provide more detailed explanations of the legal basis for enrolment under the Advocates Act, 1961.
  • Organiser and India Today focus on the BCI's claim that teachers and outsiders instigated students.
  • Coverage varies in the prominence given to the specific remarks by CJI Surya Kant that led to the student campaign.