The Conquests of Alexander
He named 20 cities after himself and one after his horse
- Open
- Thebes, before the crossing
- Anatolia, three thirty four to three thirty three before the common era
- Tyre, Gaza, and Egypt, three hundred and thirty two before the common era
- Gaugamela, the first of October, three hundred and thirty one before the common era
- Maracanda, three hundred and twenty seven before the common era
- The Hyphasis, and the road home, three hundred and twenty six to three hundred and twenty three before the common era
- Five accounts
- Greco-Macedonian
- Persian / Achaemenid
- Indian / Paurava
- Modern Central Asian
- Revisionist / Anti-Heroic
- The turn
- Close
Open
Alexander the Great is supposed to have wept when he saw the size of what he had won, because there were no more worlds left to conquer.
His own record calls that line paraphrased, and probably not his at all.
Nobody who wrote a full account of Alexander's life ever met him. Arrian, Plutarch, and Curtius Rufus, the three fullest histories that survive, were all writing centuries after he died.
Everything spoken in his own words in what follows carries that warning, every time.
Scene 1Thebes, before the crossing
Philip the Second is two years dead, murdered by one of his own bodyguards, and several Greek cities have decided his son will not hold what his father built.
Alexander marches on Thebes first. When the city falls, six thousand people are killed and thirty thousand are sold into slavery.
No other Greek city rises against him again while he lives.
Scene 2Anatolia, three thirty four to three thirty three before the common era
In the spring, Alexander crosses the Hellespont with thirty seven thousand troops and one and a half million pounds of debt.
At the Granicus River in May, he leads the first cavalry charge himself and nearly dies. A Persian commander swings a sword at his head, and Cleitus the Black cuts the man's arm off before it lands.
Cleitus has just saved the life of the man who will kill him at a dinner table eight years later.
By November, Alexander meets Darius the Third at Issus, on a coastal plain too narrow for a Persian army of some hundred thousand men to use its size. Darius flees, leaving his mother, wife, and children behind.
Scene 3Tyre, Gaza, and Egypt, three hundred and thirty two before the common era
Tyre will not surrender, so Alexander spends seven months building a causeway half a mile long through open sea to reach the island city.
When Tyre falls, two thousand military age men are crucified along the beach and thirty thousand people are sold into slavery.
Gaza holds out two more months. Its commander, Batis, is dragged alive behind a chariot when the city falls.
Egypt opens its gates and welcomes him as a liberator from Persian rule. At the oracle of Siwa, the priests call him son of Ammon, and he never once says they are wrong.
Plutarch, writing about four hundred years after Alexander was dead, has him say this about Diogenes.
· Life of Alexander · c. 100 CE
“If I were not Alexander, I would wish to be Diogenes.”

Scene 4Gaugamela, the first of October, three hundred and thirty one before the common era
Darius gathers an army ancient writers put at two hundred and fifty thousand men. Modern historians think fifty to a hundred thousand is closer to the truth.
Alexander has forty seven thousand. He breaks the Persian center with a diagonal cavalry charge still studied in military academies two thousand years later.
Darius runs a second time. Within a year his own satrap, Bessus, murders him. Alexander hunts Bessus into Central Asia and has him executed.
Scene 5Maracanda, three hundred and twenty seven before the common era
Between Gaugamela and India, Alexander campaigns for three years through what is now Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan. He marries Roxana, a Bactrian noblewoman, over the fury of his own officers.
At a drunken banquet in Maracanda, now Samarkand, he kills Cleitus the Black with a spear, in an argument over whether Philip or Alexander deserved more credit for the victories.
Cleitus is the man who cut off the arm reaching for Alexander's head at the Granicus. Alexander refuses food for three days afterward.
Curtius Rufus, a Roman writing about three hundred seventy years later, used one sentence for what Alexander had become.
· Historiae Alexandri Magni · c. 50 CE
“His body, panting with unquenchable thirst for blood, was now turning against his friends and generals.”
The man Cleitus had saved was gone. What was left killed him.

Scene 6The Hyphasis, and the road home, three hundred and twenty six to three hundred and twenty three before the common era
Alexander beats King Porus at the Hydaspes River in May, against two hundred war elephants his phalanx has never faced in that number. He wins, but eight years of marching, monsoon rain, and disease have used up his army's patience.
At the next river, the Hyphasis, his veterans refuse to go one step further east. Alexander sulks in his tent for three days, then turns the army around.
The march home through the Gedrosian Desert kills a quarter of his men, roughly fifteen thousand, to heat, thirst, and flash floods.
He reaches Babylon in three hundred and twenty three before the common era and dies on the tenth or eleventh of June, aged thirty two. His empire breaks apart within hours.
Five accounts
Five accounts of the same eleven years survive, and whether Alexander was a liberator or a catastrophe depends entirely on which side of the Hellespont a person was standing.
victorGreco-Macedonian
Greco-Macedonian
The historians who marched with Alexander told this as a Greek war of revenge. Persia had burned Athens a century and a half earlier, and Alexander threw a spear into Asian soil and came ashore first.
His own courage backs the claim. He led cavalry into the worst fighting at Issus and Gaugamela both, and at a fortress in India an arrow went through his lung and his own bodyguards carried him out over the wall.
The cities were not raiding camps. Alexandria in Egypt held three hundred thousand people within a generation, and a library that stayed the center of Greek learning for nine hundred years.
Persian officials and a mass wedding at Susa, where eighty of his officers married Persian noblewomen: this account calls that statesmanship. Someone had to govern fifty million people, and Macedonians alone could not.
Before the Sogdian Rock, Plutarch, writing about four hundred years after Alexander was dead, has him tell his own men this.
“There is nothing impossible to him who will try.”
Read the full account
Narrative
The Macedonian court historians, Callisthenes (until Alexander had him arrested), Ptolemy, Aristobulus, framed the campaign as the completion of a Greek civilizational project. Philip II had unified Greece by force at Chaeronea in 338 BCE; Alexander carried the war to Persia, which had burned Athens in 480 BCE. The crossing of the Hellespont was staged as revenge for Xerxes: Alexander threw a spear into Asian soil from his ship and was first ashore.
Arrian, writing in the 2nd century CE from Ptolemy's and Aristobulus's accounts, presents Alexander as the ideal Homeric hero: brave to the point of recklessness, generous to the defeated, driven by pothos (longing for the unknown). At Issus and Gaugamela, Alexander personally led the Companion cavalry into the thickest fighting. He was wounded at least eight times in major engagements. At the Mallian fortress in India, an arrow punctured his lung; his bodyguards had to carry him out over the wall.
The founding of cities is central to this narrative. Each Alexandria was a Greek polis transplanted: agora, gymnasium, theater, grid streets. Alexandria in Egypt, planned by Alexander himself, with Dinocrates as architect, grew to 300,000 inhabitants within a generation and became the Ptolemaic capital. The Mouseion and its Library, built under Ptolemy I and II, attracted scholars from across the Mediterranean. Euclid, Archimedes (briefly), Eratosthenes, and later Hypatia all worked there.
The Greco-Macedonian perspective treats Alexander's adoption of Persian court customs, proskynesis (prostration), Persian dress, the appointment of Persian satraps, as pragmatic governance rather than betrayal. Ruling 50 million subjects required Persian administrative infrastructure. The mass wedding at Susa in 324 BCE, where Alexander and 80 of his officers married Persian noblewomen, was a deliberate policy of fusion. Plutarch reports that Alexander said he wished to be "a common father to all" and to mix Greek and barbarian "as in a loving-cup."
This narrative minimizes or rationalizes the destruction. The burning of Persepolis (330 BCE) is presented as either an act of revenge for the burning of the Athenian Acropolis or a drunken accident encouraged by the courtesan Thais. The massacres at Tyre, Gaza, and among the Branchidae are noted but attributed to the conventions of ancient siege warfare. The murder of Cleitus is treated as a tragedy of alcohol, not character; Alexander's remorse is emphasized more than the killing.
Arguments
- Campaign was revenge for Xerxes' invasion and a civilizational mission
- Cities founded became lasting centers of Greek learning and commerce
- Adoption of Persian customs was pragmatic statecraft, not cultural betrayal
- Alexander's personal courage and military genius were historically unprecedented
Sources
- Anabasis of Alexander
- Life of Alexander (Parallel Lives)
- Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.
vanquishedPersian / Achaemenid
Persian / Achaemenid
The empire Alexander ended had run from the Aegean to the Indus for two hundred and twenty years, the largest the world had yet seen, administering twenty three provinces in multiple languages.
Alexander burned Persepolis after a banquet. He sent five thousand mules and three thousand camels to carry off the treasury first, an estimated four thousand seven hundred metric tons of silver.
The stone reliefs survived. The archives, the wooden ceilings, and the textiles did not, and with them went nearly every Persian word about what happened, written by the people it happened to.
Everything historians know about Darius the Third comes from the Greek and Roman writers who beat him, which is why he reads as a coward who fled two battles, not as the king whose own tax and grain records kept running up to the day the Macedonians arrived.
Ferdowsi wrote Iran's national epic, the Shahnameh, more than thirteen hundred years later, and it still calls him the destroyer.
“And from that day forth the fortunes of Iran declined.”
Read the full account
Narrative
The Achaemenid Empire that Alexander destroyed had governed from the Aegean to the Indus for 220 years, the largest empire the world had seen. Cyrus the Great's charter, inscribed on a clay cylinder in 539 BCE, declared religious tolerance and the right of displaced peoples to return home. The empire maintained 1,677 miles of Royal Road from Susa to Sardis, a postal relay system (the angareion) that Herodotus called the fastest in the world, and a sophisticated bureaucracy that administered 23 satrapies in multiple languages.
Alexander's invasion is framed in Persian and later Iranian historiography not as liberation but as catastrophe: the ruin of a civilization by a barbarian from the margins. The Shahnameh of Ferdowsi (c. 1010 CE), Iran's national epic, calls Alexander "Iskandar" and presents him variously as a destroyer and, in some manuscripts influenced by the Alexander Romance, as a half-brother of Darius and thus a legitimate king. The ambivalence reflects centuries of Iranian negotiation with Greek cultural domination.
The burning of Persepolis in 330 BCE is the central wound. Alexander set fire to the palace complex after a banquet. Plutarch and Diodorus Siculus disagree on whether it was planned or spontaneous. The Apadana, the Tachara, and the Treasury of Darius burned. Stone reliefs survived; the archives, the textiles, the wooden ceilings did not. Curtius Rufus records that Alexander sent 5,000 mules and 3,000 camels to carry away the treasure of Persepolis before the burning. Pierre Briant estimates the haul at 180,000 talents of silver, roughly 4,700 metric tons.
Persian sources (or rather their absence) define this perspective. The Achaemenids left administrative records (the Persepolis Fortification Tablets, the Treasury Tablets) but no narrative history. Everything we know about Darius III comes from Greek and Roman writers. Briant's From Cyrus to Alexander (2002) argues that this archival asymmetry has produced a distorted picture: Darius appears as a coward who fled two battles, but the Greek sources had every incentive to diminish the defeated king. The Persepolis tablets reveal a functioning state collecting taxes, paying workers, and managing grain distribution right up to the conquest.
What survived Alexander was Persian culture, not Persian power. Zoroastrianism persisted through the Seleucid, Parthian, and Sasanian periods. The Persian language re-emerged under the Parthians and became the literary lingua franca of the Islamic East. The Sasanian Empire (224-651 CE) explicitly claimed Achaemenid heritage and regarded Alexander as a villain, the "accursed Alexander" of Zoroastrian tradition, who burned the Avesta and killed the magi.
Arguments
- The Achaemenid Empire was a functioning, tolerant civilization, not a decadent tyranny awaiting liberation
- Greek sources control the narrative because Persian archives were destroyed by the conqueror
- The burning of Persepolis was cultural destruction on a massive scale
- Persian civilization survived and re-emerged despite two centuries of Hellenistic domination
Sources
- From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire
- The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Societal Change in Shi'ite Iran from the Beginning to 1890
- Shahnameh (The Book of Kings)
indigenousIndian / Paurava
Indian / Paurava
Greek writers describe a giant of a man on the largest elephant on the field. Indian sources do not mention him at all, and that silence is itself the argument: a battle that fills Western accounts of Alexander barely registers in Indian memory.
Porus fought with his full army at the Hydaspes, two hundred war elephants against a phalanx that had never faced them in that number. Alexander crossed the river in monsoon rain and won, but it cost him his own horse, Bucephalus, dead of wounds or exhaustion.
Arrian, writing about four hundred seventy years later, is the only place Porus's answer to the victor survives.
“How shall I treat you? As a king.”
Alexander restored him as a vassal and marched on. His own army refused to go further at the next river, and the Macedonians turned back. Within five years, Chandragupta Maurya overthrew the Nanda dynasty and built an empire larger than anything Alexander held in India.
Read the full account
Narrative
Greek sources call him Porus and describe a giant of a man, over six feet tall, riding the largest war elephant on the field. Indian sources do not mention him at all. The Battle of the Hydaspes (Jhelum River, May 326 BCE) occupies a central place in Western Alexander narratives but barely registers in Indian historical memory. This asymmetry is itself the argument.
Alexander reached the northwestern edge of the Indian subcontinent after crossing the Hindu Kush and subduing Taxila, whose king Ambhi (Omphis in Greek sources) submitted and provided supplies. Porus, ruling the territory between the Jhelum and Chenab rivers, refused. The battle that followed was the hardest of Alexander's career. Porus deployed 200 war elephants, animals the Macedonian infantry had never faced at this scale. Arrian records that the Macedonian phalanx was initially reluctant to advance against the elephant line. Alexander won through a river crossing executed in monsoon rain and a double envelopment of Porus's cavalry, but the fighting was brutal. His beloved horse Bucephalus died, either from wounds or exhaustion. Alexander founded a city, Bucephala, at the site.
The Indian perspective reframes the encounter. Porus fought with his full army and lost; Alexander offered him his kingdom back. In Arrian's account, Alexander asked Porus how he wished to be treated. "As a king," Porus answered. Alexander restored him as a vassal ruler. Indian nationalist historiography reads this differently: Porus fought the invader to a standstill, Alexander's army mutinied at the next river (the Hyphasis/Beas), and the Macedonians retreated from India. In this reading, India was not conquered; it was the place where conquest ended.
What matters more than the battle is what followed. Within five years of Alexander's departure, Chandragupta Maurya, possibly inspired by or aware of Alexander's organizational model, overthrew the Nanda dynasty and established the Maurya Empire, the first to unify most of the subcontinent. Plutarch and Justin record that Chandragupta met Alexander, though this is unverifiable. Seleucus I, Alexander's successor in the east, invaded India around 305 BCE and lost. He ceded territories west of the Indus to Chandragupta in exchange for 500 war elephants, a reversal that Indian historiography underlines as proof that Alexander's Indian campaign achieved nothing lasting.
The Gandhara region, where Alexander's veterans settled, produced a distinct artistic tradition over the following centuries. Greek sculptural techniques merged with Buddhist iconography to create the first anthropomorphic representations of the Buddha, previously depicted only by symbols (footprints, the Bodhi tree, an empty throne). The Gandhara Buddha, with his wavy hair and draped robes, is recognizably Greek in style. This cultural fusion was a byproduct of conquest, not its purpose, and Indian scholarship is divided on whether to celebrate or resent it.
Arguments
- India was where Alexander's army refused to continue; the subcontinent was not conquered
- Chandragupta Maurya's rise proves the invasion created no lasting political control
- Seleucus I's defeat by Chandragupta reversed Alexander's gains within a generation
- Indian sources do not record the Hydaspes as a major event
Sources
- The Early History of India
- The Age of the Nandas and Mauryas
- Alexander's Campaigns in Sind and Baluchistan and the Siege of the Brahmin Town of Harmatelia
academicModern Central Asian
Modern Central Asian
The cities Alexander planted across Central Asia became nodes on what would later be the Silk Road. Tajik and Uzbek historians ask what those cities were founded for.
A Sogdian nobleman named Spitamenes led a guerrilla campaign that killed two thousand Macedonian troops and held Alexander to two years of counterinsurgency, the longest resistance he met anywhere. Alexander answered by wrecking the region's farmland and deporting its people.
Central Asian tradition reads the marriage to Roxana differently than the Greek sources do: not a love match at a banquet, but a political price, paid to end the resistance by giving her father a satrapy.
Curtius Rufus, a Roman writing about three hundred seventy years later, needed one sentence for the whole campaign.
“Alexander found it easier to conquer Sogdiana than to hold it.”
Read the full account
Narrative
The cities Alexander founded across Central Asia, Alexandria Eschate (Khujand), Alexandria on the Oxus (Ai-Khanoum), Alexandropolis, and half a dozen garrison towns whose locations are disputed, became nodes on what would later be called the Silk Road. For 200 years, Greek-speaking communities persisted in Bactria (northern Afghanistan) and Sogdiana (Uzbekistan/Tajikistan), producing a hybrid civilization that minted coins in Greek script and patronized both Zeus and local fire temples.
Soviet and post-Soviet Central Asian archaeology has complicated the Greek-centric narrative. Excavations at Ai-Khanoum in northern Afghanistan (1964-1978, led by Paul Bernard) revealed a fully Hellenistic city (theater, gymnasium, heroon) but also adapted to local conditions. The palace combined Greek columns with an oriental audience hall. A treasury inscription was in Greek; the administrative archives contained Aramaic documents. The city was destroyed around 145 BCE by nomadic invaders, and its ruins lay undisturbed until French archaeologists arrived.
Central Asian scholarship, particularly from Tajik, Uzbek, and Afghan historians, resists the framing of Alexander as a civilizer. Bobomull Gafurov's Tajiks (1972), the standard Soviet-era national history of Tajikistan, presents Alexander as an invader who crushed the Sogdian revolt of Spitamenes (329-327 BCE) with extreme violence. Spitamenes, a Sogdian nobleman, led a guerrilla campaign that killed 2,000 Macedonian troops in the Zeravshan Valley and forced Alexander into two years of counterinsurgency, the longest resistance he faced anywhere. Alexander responded by devastating the Sogdian countryside. Curtius records the destruction of agricultural infrastructure, mass deportations, and the execution of prisoners.
The marriage to Roxana is read differently in Central Asian tradition. In Greek sources, it is a love match: Alexander saw her at a banquet and was smitten. In Tajik and Afghan tradition, it was a political capitulation: Alexander married a local noblewoman to pacify a region he could not subdue by force. Roxana's father Oxyartes received a satrapy; Sogdian resistance ended. The marriage produced Alexander's only legitimate son, Alexander IV, who was murdered at age 13 by Cassander.
What Central Asian historians emphasize is the continuity of local cultures beneath the Greek veneer. The Greco-Bactrian kingdom (c. 256-120 BCE) and the Indo-Greek kingdoms that followed were Greek in their elite culture but Central Asian and Indian in their populations, agricultural practices, and religious syncretism. Menander I (Milinda), an Indo-Greek king of the 2nd century BCE, became a Buddhist; his dialogue with the monk Nagasena is preserved in the Milindapanha, a Pali text. The Greek overlay was real but thin; when nomadic confederations swept through in the 2nd-1st centuries BCE, the Greek cities fell quickly and the underlying cultures reasserted themselves.
Arguments
- Greek sources dominate because Persian and Central Asian archives were destroyed by the conqueror
- Alexander's Central Asian cities became Silk Road nodes but served military not civilizational purposes
- Sogdian resistance under Spitamenes was the longest guerrilla campaign Alexander faced
- Local cultures persisted beneath the Hellenistic veneer and re-emerged after Greek power waned
Sources
- Tajiks: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern History
- Ai Khanoum: A Hellenistic City in Central Asia (Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 53)
- The Greeks in Bactria and India
revisionistRevisionist / Anti-Heroic
Revisionist / Anti-Heroic
Strip away the romance and the count runs from a hundred thousand dead to seven hundred fifty thousand, depending on which ancient tally a person trusts, across the destruction of Thebes, Tyre, and Persepolis.
After three hundred and thirty before the common era he began demanding the prostration Persian court custom required, and executing men who refused it. Callisthenes, his own tutor Aristotle's nephew, was arrested for refusing and died in custody.
He executed his general Philotas, and had Philotas's father Parmenion, seventy years old and his most experienced commander, quietly assassinated the same day.
He marched his exhausted army through the Gedrosian Desert to outdo the legendary conquerors before him, and it cost roughly fifteen thousand of his own men.
He built no civil service and named no heir. Asked on his deathbed who should have the empire, later writers give him one two word answer, to the strongest, though the Greek could just as easily have named his own general Krateros.
Read the full account
Narrative
Alexander killed somewhere between 100,000 and 750,000 people, depending on which ancient casualty figures one accepts and how much one discounts them. He destroyed at least two major cities (Thebes, Tyre) by systematic massacre. He burned the cultural capital of the Persian Empire. He murdered his own cavalry commander at a banquet. He executed his general Philotas and had Philotas's father Parmenion, his most experienced commander, aged 70, assassinated in Ecbatana on the same day. He forced his exhausted army through the Gedrosian Desert as a stunt to surpass Cyrus the Great and Semiramis, killing roughly 15,000 of his own soldiers.
The revisionist case, articulated most sharply by Ernst Badian in a series of articles from the 1960s onward, strips away the romance. Badian argued that Alexander's court historians (Callisthenes, Ptolemy, Aristobulus) were propagandists who sanitized a record of escalating violence, paranoia, and megalomania. After 330 BCE, Alexander demanded divine honors, required proskynesis from Greeks and Macedonians (who considered it degrading), and executed or imprisoned anyone who resisted. Callisthenes, Aristotle's nephew, was arrested for refusing proskynesis and died in custody, either executed or left to rot in a cage.
The drinking was prodigious even by Macedonian standards. Plutarch records all-night symposia where Alexander drank unmixed wine. Ephippus of Olynthus, a hostile source, describes Alexander wearing the horns of Ammon and the lion skin of Heracles at banquets. The murder of Cleitus (Alexander threw a javelin through the man who had saved his life, during an argument about whether Philip or Alexander deserved more credit) is difficult to rationalize away, though ancient apologists tried. Alexander's grief was real; Arrian says he refused food for three days and had to be persuaded by his officers that the philosopher Anaxarchus's argument, that a king is above ordinary morality, was correct.
The empire itself was a mirage. Alexander never established a civil administration. He appointed satraps, many of whom he later replaced or executed for corruption or disloyalty. He left no succession plan. When asked on his deathbed to whom he left his empire, he reportedly said "to the strongest", or possibly "to Krateros" (his general), the Greek words being nearly identical. The result was 40 years of wars among his successors (the Diadochi), which killed more people than his conquests. The empire that took 11 years to build was dismembered in a single generation.
Peter Green's Alexander of Macedon (1991) and Ian Worthington's By the Spear (2014) represent the modern scholarly mainstream: Alexander was a military genius of extraordinary personal courage, who was also an alcoholic, a megalomaniac, and increasingly unstable in his final years. The hero worship that pervades popular culture (Oliver Stone's 2004 film, the "Alexander the Great" brand) is a product of the same Ptolemaic propaganda that shaped Arrian's account.
Arguments
- Ancient sources are court propaganda that sanitize escalating violence and paranoia
- The killing of Cleitus, execution of Parmenion, and demand for divine honors reveal pathological narcissism
- The Gedrosian Desert march was an ego project that killed 15,000 of his own soldiers
- The empire collapsed immediately because Alexander built no institutions, only a personality cult
Sources
- Alexander the Great and the Unity of Mankind
- Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.
- By the Spear: Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and Fall of the Macedonian Empire

The turn
Each account skips what would complicate it.
The Greek and Macedonian record calls the destruction the convention of siege warfare, and says far less about Thebes, Tyre, Gaza, and the burning of Persepolis, or the drinking and paranoia of the last years.
From the record
Genocidal sieges at Tyre, Gaza, and the BranchidaeDestruction of Persepolis and its cultural treasuresAlcoholism and increasingly erratic behavior in final yearsForced deportation of Greek settlers to distant coloniesThe Persian account names every ton of silver Alexander carried off, and says less about the satraps who had already revolted against Darius before Alexander arrived, or the courtesy Alexander showed Darius's own captured family.
From the record
Internal weaknesses of the late Achaemenid state, including satrapal revoltsEgyptian and Babylonian populations that welcomed Alexander as a liberatorPersian imperial violence against subject populations (Ionian revolts, Egyptian rebellions)Alexander's respectful treatment of the Persian royal familyThe Indian account is built on an army that mutinied, and says little about the battle Alexander actually won at the Hydaspes, or the Greek coinage and city planning northwestern India kept using long after the Macedonians left.
From the record
Alexander's tactical victory at the HydaspesGreek cultural contributions to Gandhara Buddhist artTaxila's voluntary submission to AlexanderThe lasting Hellenistic influence on northwestern Indian coinage and urban planningThe Central Asian account, which names the guerrilla war in the most detail, says less about the Greco-Bactrian kingdoms it produced, kingdoms where a Greek king later became a Buddhist.
From the record
Genuine cultural exchange and artistic innovation in Greco-Bactrian periodGreek contributions to urban planning, coinage, and administrative practicesVoluntary adoption of Greek language and customs by some Central Asian elitesThe Milindapanha and Indo-Greek Buddhist patronageAnd the revisionist case, which spares him nothing, has the least interest in the library at Alexandria or the language the New Testament was later written in, both of which trace back to the same eleven years it condemns.
From the record
Genuine cultural achievements of the Hellenistic world Alexander initiatedAlexander's tolerance of local religions and customs in conquered territoriesReal military innovation in combined-arms tactics and logisticsThe agency of conquered peoples who adopted Greek culture voluntarily

Close
He founded more than twenty cities across three continents, and named nearly all of them Alexandria, after himself.
On the bank of the Hydaspes he named one more. Bucephala, after the horse that had carried him into battle and died there, from wounds or from exhaustion. The ancient sources cannot agree on which.
The record
By the numbers
- Span
- 11 yrs334-323 BCE
- Killed
- Hundreds of thousands across three…
- Displaced
- 50MPersian Empire, subjects, Greek city-states, Central…
- Place
- Macedon
Key figures
- Alexander III of MacedonKing of Macedon, conqueror of the Persian Empire-356 to -323
- Darius IIILast King of the Achaemenid Persian Empire-380 to -330
- HephaestionAlexander's closest companion and second-in-command-356 to -324
- AristotlePhilosopher, tutor to Alexander from age 13 to 16-384 to -322
- RoxanaBactrian princess, Alexander's wife-340 to -310
- Porus (Paurava)King of Paurava, defeated at the Battle of the Hydaspes-340 to -315
- Cleitus the BlackMacedonian cavalry commander, saved Alexander at Granicus, killed by Alexander in a drunken quarrel-375 to -328
Primary sources
· Life of Alexander (Parallel Lives) · c. 100 CE
“When Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer.”
· Life of Alexander · c. 100 CE
“If I were not Alexander, I would wish to be Diogenes.”
· Historiae Alexandri Magni · c. 50 CE
“His body, panting with unquenchable thirst for blood, was now turning against his friends and generals.”
Threads
- Ashoka and the Maurya EmpireHe carved the body count into rock for everyone to read: 100,000 killed, 150,000 deported. Then, on the same stone, he said he regretted it.
- The Cyrus CylinderHe freed the Babylonians, the Jews, and the Egyptians, and put it in writing. 2,500 years before human rights became a legal concept.
- The Peloponnesian WarAthens told the island of Melos: submit or die. Melos chose neutrality. Athens killed every man and enslaved the women and children.