The tribunal's findings
- Holders
- ECCC Trial Chamber (Case 001, 2010); ECCC Supreme Court Chamber (Case 001, 2012); ECCC Trial Chamber (Case 002/01, 2014; Case 002/02, 2018); ECCC Supreme Court Chamber (Case 002/02, 2022)
- Rests on
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 001 Judgement, 26 July 2010 (Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch)Tier A, by a holder
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Supreme Court Chamber, Case 001 Appeal Judgement, 3 February 2012 (Kaing Guek...Tier A, by a holder
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/01 Judgement, 7 August 2014 (Nuon Chea and...Tier A, by a holder
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/02 Judgement, 16 November 2018 (Nuon Chea and...Tier A, by a holder
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/02, Summary of Judgement (2018)Tier A, by a holder
- អង្គជំនុំជម្រះសាលាដំបូង នៃអង្គជំនុំជម្រះវិសាមញ្ញក្នុងតុលាការកម្ពុជា (Trial Chamber, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia), សេចក្តីសង្ខេបសាលក្រម សំណុំរឿង ០០២/០២ (Summary of... (2018)Tier A, by a holder
- Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Supreme Court Chamber, Case 002/02 Appeal Judgment, 23 December 2022 (Khieu...Tier A, by a holder
- Kingdom of Cambodia, National Assembly, Law on the Establishment of Extraordinary Chambers in... (2004)Tier A, by a holder
- United Nations and Royal Government of Cambodia, Agreement between the United Nations and the Royal... (2003)Tier A, by a holder
- Claims
- No fewer than 12,273 people were detained at S-21 and no fewer than 12,272 executed; between 600,000 and 3 million died under the regime, with 1.5 to 2 million the most accurate band; genocide was committed against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the killing of Khmer was charged as crimes against humanity.
- Omits
- Why genocide was charged for two minorities only: the Closing Order did not explain it, and the one judge who asked the question wrote a separate opinion rather than a finding.
Tested against the primary record
QualifiedNo fewer than 12,273 people were detained at S-21, and no fewer than 12,272 were executed.
Rests on documents from: Testimony of the accused; Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.
The count is the tribunal's revised list, built by the Co-Prosecutors from lists DC-Cam compiled out of S-21's own prisoner registers and execution logs, and the accused put his own figure at more than 12,300 killed. The registers are the perpetrators' record read through the court, and the court itself says certain entries carry minimal information; a floor carried by the prison's own books and its commandant's admission is not an independent count, so the verdict is capped at qualified.
The 4 extracts it rests on
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 001 Judgement, 26 July 2010 (Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch)
141. The Revised S-21 Prisoner List indicates that no fewer than 12,273 individuals were detained at S-21.239 This list is a revision of an earlier list relied upon in the Amended Closing Order which indicated that no fewer than 12,380 individuals were detained at S- 21.240 The Revised S-21 Prisoner List contains 5,994 entries as men, 1,698 as women and 89 as children.241 5,609 entries are members of the RAK and 4,371 are DK cadres, while 1,751 are neither members of RAK nor DK cadres.242 Furthermore, it describes 876 entries as relatives of somebody else;243 328 as soldiers in the Khmer Republic Army (“KRA”);244 279 as either teachers, professors, students, doctors, lawyers or engineers;245 345 as Vietnamese, of whom 122 are described as Vietnamese soldiers, 144 as Vietnamese spies while for the remaining 79, who were presumably civilians, no description is provided.246 Finally, it also contains 155 entries for former S-21 Staff and 590 for individuals arrested from S-24.247 Certain of the entries on the Revised S-21 Prisoner List contain minimal information.248
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 001 Judgement, 26 July 2010 (Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch)
240 See Amended Closing Order, paras 107, 140; “S-21 Prisoner List (1975-1978)”, E3/38 Annex A. This list was a collation by the Office of the Co-Prosecutors of previous lists compiled by DC-Cam based on the original prisoner lists and execution logs of S-21. The Combined S-21 Prisoner List contained 107 entries which appeared to be duplicate entries and were thus removed by the Office of the Co-Prosecutors from the Revised Prisoner List. See “Co-Prosecutors' Rule 92 Motion to disclose analysis of the revised S-21 Prisoner List”, E68, 19 May 2009, paras 3-4.
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 001 Judgement, 26 July 2010 (Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch)
597. The Chamber has found the Accused criminally responsible for crimes of a particularly shocking and heinous character. As Deputy and then Chairman of S-21, the Accused managed and refined a system over the course of more than three years that resulted in the execution of no fewer than 12,272 victims, the majority of whom were also systematically tortured. Victims who were not executed died as a result of the conditions of detention, which led to widespread disease, malnourishment and physical and psychological pain, as well as extreme fear. The Accused worked tirelessly to ensure that S-21 ran as efficiently as possible and did so out of unquestioning loyalty to his superiors and CPK ideology, without regard to the humanity of the detainees he oversaw. Under his tutelage, S-21 became a highly efficient instrument of persecution in furtherance of a politically-motivated policy of discrimination.
Kaing Guek Eav alias Duch, statements before the Trial Chamber and the Supreme Court Chamber, compiled by the ECCC, Compilation of statements of apology made by Kaing Guek... (2012)
[p. 67 Lines 2-9]7 In conclusion, if you look at the photo of me taken in those days when I was training cadres, it seems like I was quite a person with my heightened class consciousness, but as I look at it carefully now, I find the photo shameful. It is shocking and upsetting to see that picture of me, I who killed more than 12,300 people. I am accountable for all the crimes committed at S-21. At the same time, as a member of the Party, I am appalled by the fact that more than 1 million Cambodians lost their lives. I am morally responsible for the loss of more than one million lives, now and forever.
QualifiedThe crime of genocide was committed against the Cham and against the Vietnamese.
Rests on documents from: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia; Group of Experts for Cambodia (United Nations).
The finding is the court's, entered in Khmer and English in 2018; the United Nations' experts had found in 1999 that the two groups qualify as protected groups and that intent had support in the evidence, and asked a tribunal to investigate. Two producers, but the second asked the question the first answered, so the verdict is qualified rather than supported.
The 4 extracts it rests on
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/02, Summary of Judgement (2018)
30. The Chamber thus finds that the crime of genocide and the crimes against humanity of murder, extermination, imprisonment, torture, persecution on political and religious grounds, and the other inhumane acts through conduct characterised as forced transfer were committed with respect to the Cham.
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/02, Summary of Judgement (2018)
34. The Chamber thus finds that the crime of genocide and the crimes against humanity of murder, extermination, deportation and persecution on racial grounds were committed regarding the Vietnamese. In addition, recalling the existence of the ongoing international armed conflict between Vietnam and Democratic Kampuchea from May 1975 and the protected status of the victims, the Chamber finds that several grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions were also perpetrated against this group at S-21 Security Centre, including wilful killing, torture, inhumane treatment, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, wilful deprivation of the rights of a fair and regular trial and unlawful confinement.
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/02 Judgement, 16 November 2018 (Nuon Chea and...
3993. Having established that a CPK policy to destroy the Cham population existed from 1977,13253 the Chamber finds that the CPK policy targeting the Cham had as its primary objective their physical destruction as an ethnic and religious group, as such. The Chamber is satisfied that the treatment of the Cham demonstrates the CPK’s objective of establishing an atheistic and homogenous society without class divisions and, in so doing, the Party’s intent to abolish all national, religious, class and cultural differences. The Chamber is further satisfied that this objective was implemented through the CPK’s policy to identify, arrest, isolate and “smash” enemies,13254 and was therefore in furtherance of the common purpose of rapidly implementing socialist revolution through a “great leap forward” in order to, among other things, defend the country against enemies and radically transform the population into an atheistic and homogenous Khmer society. The Chamber accordingly finds that the crime of genocide
Group of Experts for Cambodia (Ninian Stephen, Rajsoomer Lallah, Steven R. Ratner), transmitted by the Secretary-General, Report of the Group of Experts for Cambodia established... (1999)
63. In the view of the Group of Experts, the existing historical research justifies including genocide within the jurisdiction of a tribunal to prosecute Khmer Rouge leaders. In particular, evidence suggests the need for prosecutors to investigate the commission of genocide against the Cham, Vietnamese and other minority groups, and the Buddhist monkhood.11 The Khmer Rouge subjected these groups to an especially harsh and extensive measure of the acts enumerated in the Convention. The requisite intent has support in direct and indirect evidence, including Khmer Rouge statements, eyewitness accounts and the nature and number of victims in each group, both in absolute terms and in proportion to each group’s total population.12 These groups qualify as protected groups under the Convention: the Muslim Cham as an ethnic and religious group; the Vietnamese communities as an ethnic and, perhaps, a racial group; and the Buddhist monkhood as a religious group.
SupportedEstimates of the dead range from 600,000 to 3 million, and experts accept 1.5 to 2 million as the most accurate.
Rests on documents from: Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia; Group of Experts for Cambodia (United Nations).
The tribunal's own survey lists every estimate from 740,800 to the 2 to 3 million used by governments; the United Nations' experts, a second producer, put the scholars' figures at 1.5 million and nearly 1.7 million, about 20 per cent of a population of 7.3 to 7.9 million, and record that historians reject 2 to 3 million. The experts' figures sit inside the tribunal's band and their rejection matches its edge.
The 3 extracts it rests on
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/01 Judgement, 7 August 2014 (Nuon Chea and...
never been identified and that many who died were never buried.522 Overall, estimates indicate that between 600,000 and 3 million died as a result of Khmer Rouge policies and actions. Within this range, experts accept estimates falling between 1.5 and 2 million excess deaths as the most accurate.523
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Trial Chamber, Case 002/01 Judgement, 7 August 2014 (Nuon Chea and...
523 T. 25 July 2012 (David CHANDLER), pp. 9-12 (the consensus is that between 1.5 and 3 million people died under the Khmer Rouge); T. 10 April 2013 (François PONCHAUD), pp. 75-76 (in 1986, PONCHAUD estimated that 800,000 people were killed during the DK regime, CIA were estimating that 1.4 million people were killed and other embassies were estimating that 1 million people were killed); Article by P. HEUVELINE: The Unbearable Certainty of Numbers: Estimating the Death Toll of the Khmer Rouge Period, E3/1798, Nov-Dec 1998, p. 10, ERN (En) 00291624 (After reviewing various estimates, determining that the central interval, 1.5 to 2.5 million excess deaths, is most probable); Article by P. HEUVELINE: ‘Between One and Three Million’: Towards the Demographic Reconstruction of a Decade of Cambodian History (1970-79), E3/1799, 1998, p. 60, ERN (En) 00096735 (Heuveline estimates that there were 1.5 to 2 million excess deaths in 1975-1978, and states that, in his reconstruction, at least 600,000, and possibly as many as 2 million, deaths, cannot be accounted for by either a general decline in life expectancy or by the mortality due to the war prior to 1975); Article by B. SHARP: Counting Hell, E3/1801, undated, p. 24, ERN (En) 00078288 (After reviewing other experts’ figures, SHARP identifies a range of 1.747 million to 2.459 million deaths due to Khmer Rouge policies and actions; SHARP considers the midpoint of the range being 2.12 million “falls fairly close to the most likely figure”); Book by M. VICKERY: Cambodia 1975-1982, E3/1757, 1984, pp. 200-201, ERN (En) 00397115-16 (M. VICKERY estimated that 740,800 deaths were caused by the special conditions during the DK. He estimated that more than half were caused by hunger, exhaustion and illness and about 300,000 people were executed. He suggested that more accurate estimates were impossible and that it was impossible to project a figure of 1-2 million executions based on the data available in 1984); Demographic Expert Report: Khmer Rouge Victims in Cambodia, April 1975-January 1979: A Critical Assessment of Major Estimates, E3/2413, 30 September 2009, pp. 15-19, 64-70, ERN (En) 00385258-62, 00385326-32 (Excess death estimates published between 1980 and 1993 consistently approach one million, except VICKERY who suggested 740,000. Later estimates made between 1995 and 2009 range from 1.4 million to 2.2 million. After reviewing all these estimates, the authors accepted that the interval of 1.747 to 2.2 million deaths under the Khmer Rouge is the most likely range and determined that earlier estimates heavily underestimated the scale of actual killing by the Khmer Rouge).
Group of Experts for Cambodia (Ninian Stephen, Rajsoomer Lallah, Steven R. Ratner), transmitted by the Secretary-General, Report of the Group of Experts for Cambodia established... (1999)
35. Finally, scholars and Governments have offered differing totals for the number of Cambodians killed by the Khmer Rouge. Scholars have separately arrived at figures of 1.5 million and nearly 1.7 million.4 There was a sharp disparity among victim groups. One study posits close to a 100 per cent death rate for rural and urban ethnic Vietnamese, 25 per cent for urban and rural Khmer "new people", and 15 per cent for rural Khmer "base people".5 Overall, the various estimates point to a death rate of approximately 20 per cent of the April 1975 population of 7.3 to 7.9 million people. Historians of Cambodia have rejected the figure of 2 to 3 million that has often been used by the
